Concise viewpoint papers: focused arguments, explicit assumptions, and references when needed. This is intentionally lighter than formal review papers.
-
Why should we NOT get used to it?
Adapting to a problem can make it easier to leave unresolved. We should keep questioning habits, examining their costs, and expecting improvement.
-
Should a new idea already outperform the state of the art?
Current performance alone cannot determine a research direction's value. Requiring new ideas to win before supporting their development can prevent breakthroughs.
-
Should Peer Reviews Be More Intensive for High-Impact Journals?
Two valid philosophies collide: same rigor everywhere vs extra rigor where flaws can propagate further.
-
DEM of Difference vs. Differences of DEM
Why 'DEM of Difference' is semantically shaky, and why 'differences of DEMs' is cleaner and more precise.